Abstract This scholarly article investigates the implementation of court excellence frameworks as a mechanism for expediting trials, thereby improving legal efficiency within Indonesia's judicial landscape. The Indonesian justice system confronts considerable challenges in delivering timely justice, largely attributed to case backlogs and procedural inefficiencies. Court excellence principles are examined here as a strategic approach to streamline judicial processes, boost institutional efficiency, and accelerate case resolutions. Through an analysis of Indonesia’s legal structures and current practices, this paper underscores the critical role of court excellence principles in fostering a justice system that is both equitable and efficient. Key insights and strategic recommendations are provided to support the effective implementation of expedited trials, ultimately promoting legal expediency in Indonesia.
American Bar Association. (2006). Speedy Trial and Timely Resolution of Criminal Cases. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
Betterman v. Montana, 136 S. Ct. 1609 (2016).
Bloate v. United States, 559 U.S. 196 (2010).
Dalton, T., & Singer, J. M. (2014). Bigger isn’t always better: An analysis of court efficiency using hierarchical linear modeling. Pace Law Review, 34(3), 1170.
Hartanto, H., et al. (2021). The implementation of simple, expeditious, and inexpensive principle for quality private court decision through e-court. ICEEP 2021 Proceedings, 22.
Ostrom, B. (2010). Achieving High Performance: A Framework for Courts. Virginia: National Center for State Courts.
Ostrom, B., & Hanson, R. A. (2000). Efficiency, Timeliness, and Quality: A New Perspective from Nine State Criminal Trial Courts. Nevada: U.S. Department of Justice.
Peyrache, A., & Zago, A. (2024). The inefficiency of courts of justice: Industry structure, capacity, and misallocation. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 62, 217-238.
The World Bank. (1999). Reducing Court Delays: Five Lessons from the United States. Geneva: Prem Notes 1999.
