IRCI Article ID: IRCI-AR-0000002127

Effectiveness of Social Forestry Programs in Improving Community Welfare: A Quantitative Analysis

Journal: Journal of Horizon

Publication: 2024-11-28 · Vol. 1 No. 2 · pp. 28–38

DOI: 10.62872/jh.v1i2.570

Cite this article

Citation

Choose a citation style or copy BibTeX for your reference manager.

 
View Original Publication

Abstract

Social forestry programs in Indonesia have been implemented to improve the welfare of communities living within and around state forest areas. Despite a national target of 12.7 million hectares allocated for community management, empirical evidence on the determinants of welfare outcomes remains fragmented. This quantitative study examines the effect of five independent variables—income contribution from social forestry (X1), institutional capacity of farmer groups (X2), technical accompaniment (X3), market access (X4), and land tenure security (X5)—on community welfare (Y) among social forestry permit holders in selected sites across Indonesia. Data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to 120 respondents from active kelompok tani hutan (KTH) across five study sites in East Java, West Nusa Tenggara, NTT, and Sulawesi. Instruments were validated through Pearson validity testing and reliability testing using Cronbach's alpha (α > 0.70 for all constructs). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression. Results indicate that all five independent variables are significantly and positively correlated with community welfare. Multiple regression analysis yields an Adjusted R² of 0.596, indicating that the five variables together explain 59.6% of variance in community welfare. Income contribution (β = 0.312, p < 0.001) and technical accompaniment (β = 0.272, p < 0.001) emerge as the strongest predictors. Institutional capacity (β = 0.236, p < 0.001), market access (β = 0.193, p = 0.003), and land tenure security (β = 0.141, p = 0.027) also significantly predict welfare outcomes.

0
IRCI Cited By
0
Indexed References

Authors

References

No references were harvested yet.

Cited By (0)

No indexed citing article has been matched by IRCI yet.