IRCI Article ID: IRCI-AR-0000001605

Resilient Organizations in Turbulent Economies: A Conceptual Model of Adaptive Strategy

Authors:

Riinawati Riinawati Riinawati, Riinawati

Journal: International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting

Publication: 2025-12-31 · Vol. 3 No. 7 · pp. 535–543

DOI: 10.47353/ijema.v3i7.281

Cite this article

Citation

Choose a citation style or copy BibTeX for your reference manager.

Style

View Original Publication

Abstract

This study develops a conceptual model of adaptive strategy to explain how organizations build resilience in turbulent economic environments. Increasing global uncertainty—driven by economic volatility, technological disruption, and geopolitical instability—has challenged traditional strategic management approaches that rely on stability and predictability. Existing frameworks often treat resilience and strategy as separate constructs, limiting their explanatory power in dynamic contexts. This study addresses this gap by integrating resilience theory and adaptive strategy into a unified conceptual framework. Using a qualitative conceptual approach, this research synthesizes insights from strategic management, organizational theory, and complexity theory. The proposed model conceptualizes resilience as a dynamic capability that enables organizations to anticipate, absorb, and adapt to external shocks. Adaptive strategy is framed as an iterative process shaped by environmental uncertainty, organizational learning, and resource reconfiguration. The study identifies three core dimensions of organizational resilience: strategic flexibility, adaptive capacity, and institutional alignment. These dimensions interact to form a feedback-driven system that enhances organizational survival and long-term performance. The findings suggest that resilience is not a static attribute but a continuous process of strategic adaptation. This study contributes to the literature by offering an integrative framework that bridges resilience and strategy, providing a foundation for future empirical research. From a managerial perspective, the model highlights the importance of agility, learning, and institutional responsiveness in navigating turbulent economic environments.

0
IRCI Cited By

88
Indexed References

Authors

Riinawati Riinawati

Affiliation: Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, Indonesia

Riinawati, Riinawati

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishing.

Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615–1660. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1615

Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., & Mäler, K.-G. (2003). Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(4), 647–685. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000007357.78828.98

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press.

Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095

Bardhan, P. (2005). Scarcity, conflicts, and cooperation: Essays in the political and institutional economics of development. MIT Press.

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6

Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484358443.006

Bowles, S. (2012). The new economics of inequality and redistribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ber050

Dasgupta, P. (2007). Measuring sustainable development: Theory and application. Asian Development Review, 24(1), 1–10.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Dixit, A. (2009). Governance institutions and economic activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.5

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.

Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index revisited. Review of International Organizations, 14, 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. Penguin.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press.

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Beacon Press.

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.

Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674287013

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6

Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484358443.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484352076.006

Bowles, S. (2012). The new economics of inequality and redistribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ber050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012980

Dasgupta, P. (2007). Measuring sustainable development: Theory and application. Asian Development Review, 24(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0116110507000012

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Dixit, A. (2009). Governance institutions and economic activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.5

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index revisited. Review of International Organizations, 14, 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829484

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542

Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae28-3k

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434

Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595